ENGINCCRING-IN-CHIEF BRANCH versus JALALUDDIN
Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Impact of Salary Promotion / Salary Returns on Salary Returns After 7 Years, the Service Tribunal has issued this order after seven years' interval of pay. Sorted this order based on. After the pay fixation was implemented, there was no Luxury Punishment left and the departmental authorities had no authoritative authority to drop the order so that they could consider compliance: (i) the order of fixing the defendant's salary was non-existent. The legality was the first, and therefore the principle of luxury punitiveness was not attracted, since it would cover only the actions that fall under the law and not its profits. (ii) This principle of locus punitiveness has not been drawn to the facts of the case because promotion is not a right of anybody. And (iii) respondents cannot be allowed to illegally promote the bias of their seniors in the service.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Gujar Khan lawyer
