SHAHID MAHMOOD versus CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION
Reglin 3 (i) (i) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 Pattinsker retired from employment after receiving leave preparation facilities, provident fund benefits, gratuities and pensions. The Retirement Rules Petitioner sought the declaration that his retirement alterations were invalid and illegal, in view of the decision made in SC 304 of PLD 1987 and may continue to be declared in service. Before the verdict is given, their full effect is in accordance with the tenor of the laws under which it was taken that the petitioner could not be given the declaration which he had sought because he was already 60 years old. It's been years.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Kech lawyer
