Find a Lawyer

QAMAR DIN versus UMAR DIN

Article 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) allowed to appeal; approval of misrepresentation of evidence by the High Court for reconsideration of evidence on the jurisdictional suit, jurisdictional declaration of suit and order of injunction. Appeal to consider the default request that the High Court itself misrepresent the evidence in this case. That is, in 5 cases the misrepresentation of evidence and therefore a re-examination of the evidence in this case was necessary. (ii) that no objection was raised in relation to the method of proof of exhibition which was an agreement between the father and son and which was based on the applicant's total claim, this document was not substantiated. , Was not open about this in the editing phase. And (iii) the applicant being a landless village himself, could only buy the disputed shop in his father's name because he could not buy the said property in his name. immigration advocates contact from Raiwind lawyer