UBAIDULLAH versus SHER MOHAMMAD
0 XLVII, R 1 Appeal filed by donor for cancellation of gift change and transfer of gifted land that he had never made, nor occupied. The suit was ordered by the trial court and the appeal failed as well. The High Court also rejected on the ground that the summary findings of the facts of the two courts against the petitioner were subsequently filed by the petitioner under which he for the first time submitted a certified copy of the original variable. What was That the plaintiff knew the applicant fully and said that the documentary evidence was in his knowledge as long as he could present at the trial even if he had acted diligently, the High Court had also thought. That in filing a review request, the provisions of OXLVII, R 1, CPC were not complied with that there was no error in the incomplete order of the High Court's refusal to appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Makli lawyer