GULZAR ALIAS GULZARI versus STATE
0NXNX, RR 1 and 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The injunction execution proceedings began by the respondents to vacate the dispute, saying that the applicant had temporarily stopped the proceedings. On hearing the petition, the appellate court had decided that before the review of the petitioner, before settling the matter between the parties of the High Court, it was decided that the premises be filed. The current nature of the matter remains to be heard and the applicant will hand over the premises to the respondents. In favor of this, the petitioner, challenging the aforesaid order of the High Court, accepted the agreement as a compromise on the ground that the defendant had threatened to compromise the structure of the building. If the terms of the agreement are included in the High Court order. Any way the action was violated by either party, it would have to be for the High Core
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Parachinar lawyer
