IRSHAD AHMAD KHAN versus SHAFIQ KHAN
Section 21 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) A1, R10 Respondents / Defendants are not joining the tenancy process as co-owners with the applicant landlord but claiming to be the landlord in relation to the property in dispute. Applicants compile the applicant's profit title that was rented. Defendants were charged with fraudulent applicants and exercising powers and did not have the authority to interfere, either the requisite or appropriate parties and the jurisdiction of the rent controller And the forum can be seen as a way to stop their complaints that they have implemented. Was wrong and their presence in the proceedings would be not only inappropriate but also prejudicial, for which the applicant was pursuing litigation before the High Court's rent controller order in which to interfere with the applicant's plea. Permission was granted because the landlord is separated and in the circumstances their application is dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Larkana lawyer