NAZAR MUHAMMAD FATIANA versus STATE
Sections 6 526 and 1 56? of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) giving notice to the High Court Adeal Sessions Judge giving damaging remarks or demanding that Lux Standi be challenged by a party in this matter. While the complainant is allowed. Applications under section 6 526 and, applications applications A, the CCPC High Court transferred the petitioner's case from the Additional Sessions Judge's Court as a Sessions Judge and, while approving the contentious remarks, Pica filed the complaint on behalf of the applicant. Talk to each other that there is no reason to pass, without notice or seeking comment against the Additional Sessions Judge, severe criticism and hurtful remarks, no entertainment on the ground. Gone! The Hat Petitioner had no firm stand to take on the role of Additional Sessions Judge and could only find him. Resolve, as provided by law, leave the appeal for advice if advised.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Bolan lawyer