Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NAZAR MUHAMMAD FATIANA versus STATE


Sections 6 526 and 1 56? of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) giving notice to the High Court Adeal Sessions Judge giving damaging remarks or demanding that Lux Standi be challenged by a party in this matter. While the complainant is allowed. Applications under section 6 526 and, applications applications A, the CCPC High Court transferred the petitioner's case from the Additional Sessions Judge's Court as a Sessions Judge and, while approving the contentious remarks, Pica filed the complaint on behalf of the applicant. Talk to each other that there is no reason to pass, without notice or seeking comment against the Additional Sessions Judge, severe criticism and hurtful remarks, no entertainment on the ground. Gone! The Hat Petitioner had no firm stand to take on the role of Additional Sessions Judge and could only find him. Resolve, as provided by law, leave the appeal for advice if advised.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Bolan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.