Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HYDER SIDDIQUI versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER SIND

In the Section 10 property, the appellant was allotted and was not available for transfer because the respondents were questioned about his allotment, cooperating in favor of his residence in the presence of an authentic PTO, The order was illegal. The order authority reverses their allotment without hearing the appellant or proposing a pre-show notice to accommodate the defendant is a violation of the law itself and is based on a invalid and unlawful order. All subsequent orders were of no legal performance. property advocate from Darya Khan lawyer