MUHAMMAD ILLYAS versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE
A. XXIII, R 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) unanimous order challenged on the basis that the decree was passed at the time that the applicant was a minor, without showing that he was a minor or The case was ineligible. On the day when the matter was compromised, the applicant was represented by a lawyer, and it was important that it could not be said that a decree of consent against a minor was made against him. Was approved.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Dinga lawyer
