Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAEED versus FAZAL MUHAMMAD

Section 12 Suit for Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Property Seller's Contract Specific Performance Passing a Suit for Poor Money The compromised respondent was required to pay the remaining amount and he 8 8 1981 Submitted to. The applicant's request for money was placed in a bank cell in a profit-generating account for the same reasons that it could not be implemented until 24 198 1985 and it was registered or the applicant asked this question in 4 198 1985. It was only after I withdrew. The First Appellate Court affirmed that the benefit accrued while remaining with the bank should go to the defendant. The leave of appeal was granted to examine the argument that the High Court as well. The trial court was also mistaken in that the defendant was entitled to the profit made after the sale was executed and the property was provided to the defendant. property advocate from Mir Ali lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes