Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus STATE

The defendant was convicted by the trial court and sentenced to life imprisonment, taking advantage of suspicion of proof of section 365A Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), section 7 (e). Weapons and threats and during this period he was kept on liquid foods and sometimes surprisingly, when he was recovered as a result of police efforts at night, he needed neither treatment nor rest. And the next morning he went to his shop to rest on the principle of skepticism by the secure criminal administration, which demanded that the prosecution fail to establish a charge against the accused beyond reasonable doubt, the High Court Sentenced by the trial court and set aside the sentence and acquitted him. Appeals were allowed to be charged

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• ALI AKBAR v. State 2014 YLR 778
• AKBAR ALI SHAH v. State 2014 YLR 782
• ALI HAIDER v. State 2014 PCrLJ 783
• CHIEF ENGINEER AND PROJECT DIRECTOR v. 2ND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HYDERABAD 2014 MLD 789
• POWER LINKS v. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION, F.B.R. 2014 PTD 796
• GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2014 PLC(CS) 797
• DADAI alias ASHRAF v. State 2014 MLD 802
• Rao MUHAMMAD ARASTU v. State 2014 PCrLJ 802

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

divorce advocates from Lakki Marwat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes