MUHAMMAD SHAHZADA versus STATE
Article 2302 / Constitution 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) In the whole case of restoration of the proof of approval, it is argued that without the free confrontation in the material details the conviction on the evidence of acceptance cannot be stayed and if the other witnesses If his testimony was to be relied upon as persuasive, it was doubtful whether he was a credible witness, as his statement was recorded twelve days after the incident when a witness himself investigated the incident. And if he was an eyewitness, the decision was taken by the Supreme Court that the evidence needed to be re-examined in the interest of leave of justice.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Tando Jam lawyer
