MUHAMMAD ISHFAQUE versus ASGHAR ALI
Section 13 and 14 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article l85 (3) dismissed the request for removal for the sole purpose of the landlord's personal need, which was not challenged by the landlord named the revocation order and thereafter Against the provision of section 14 of the Ordinance High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction supporting the new petition, the rent controller also dismissed the need for the landlord in a different ground through the appellate court, to decide the matter later. Remanded the rental controller. According to the law, the request for eviction on the merit was that the first application was dismissed by the landlord, how was it possible that within a few days the circumstances had changed so much that the personal need of the landlord was negligible and if any If the latter application was not enforceable under the provisions of section 14, no time limit could be set for C nor the execution of the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Ali Chak lawyer