Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD ISHFAQUE versus ASGHAR ALI


Section 13 and 14 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article l85 (3) dismissed the request for removal for the sole purpose of the landlord's personal need, which was not challenged by the landlord named the revocation order and thereafter Against the provision of section 14 of the Ordinance High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction supporting the new petition, the rent controller also dismissed the need for the landlord in a different ground through the appellate court, to decide the matter later. Remanded the rental controller. According to the law, the request for eviction on the merit was that the first application was dismissed by the landlord, how was it possible that within a few days the circumstances had changed so much that the personal need of the landlord was negligible and if any If the latter application was not enforceable under the provisions of section 14, no time limit could be set for C nor the execution of the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Ali Chak lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.