UMAR DIN versus SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, LAHORE
Section 2, 3 and 4 of the Homelessness (Land Settlement) (Amendment) Act (1979) of Pakistan (1973), Art 185 (3), leave of appeal for the first time the respondents included in these constitutions Approved for scrutiny The High Court has specifically stated that it is unhappy with the Applicant's (Reporter's) Act and its decision. That the defendant imposed the petitioner before the Chief Settlement Commissioner but in any proceeding before the High Court, despite any objection by the petitioner, secondly, Act XXXVI of 1974 which constituted the preceding effect and made it a It was entitled, and finally, that the provisions of Sections 10 and 11 of the Homeless Persons (Land Settlement) Act, 1958, governed the matter, which had no scope for discrimination. Case for High Court of Appeal Bench as noted in constitutional petition
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Gaggo Mandi lawyer