MOHAN versus STATE
On the basis of oath of the OXI, R3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the defendants have been advised by one and all the defendants to take oath by the plaintiff. I cancel the order, which is to be taken by the plaintiff from the Holy See. The effect is that he had bargained for the home with the deceased owner and it was not a hypothetical fraudulent statement obtained against the decree that was recorded, so the defendant's lawyer and his lawyer were the plaintiff. Signed, took oath after the approval of the offer and as a result, a lawsuit was filed in his favor, the applicant, in dispute, only one tenant in the house filed an appeal against this decree As it was dismissed, so did his second appeal to the applicant, who was only a tenant, with no title to the house. Prior to the High Court's dismissal, the review petition filed against the order was dismissed because the applicant, without any submissions, presented the same arguments before the Supreme Court as the High Court and
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Sambrial lawyer
