MAZHAR IQBAL versus STATE
Taking advantage of the testimony of Section 9 (c), the defendant denied contradictions in his statement under Section 342CC, contradictions were found in the statements of the prosecution witnesses, and the Chemical Examiner's report stated that private individuals The individuals were not associated during the recovery process. There was no report of the heroin seed chemical inspector in the packet being sent to the chemical inspector, and the trial court's erroneous observations that the defendant never denied recovery could not be overlooked. Have raised serious doubts. It cannot be said that she has, without any doubt, been able to prove her case. Trial trial case in which the accused was convicted and sentenced, set aside, and the accused released.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer
