Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MOHAMMAD IMRAN versus GOHAR REHMAN


Article 17 (1B) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Employees of WAPDA were considered to be government employees only to seek relief against termination of service of employees, orders for removal by Labor Court. Had jurisdiction to deal with. And the Labor Appellate Tribunal had no jurisdiction with regard to the dismissal of such employees. The High Court was at fault in refusing to interfere. The judicial review did not consider that Section 17 of Act XXXI of 1958 ( 1 B) Applies to the investigation of this case. On appeal, the High Court, the Labor Appellate Tribunal and the Labor Court were set aside by the Supreme Court.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from Muzaffarabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.