Find a Lawyer

CHAUDHRY UMAR JAVED versus INTESAR HUSSAIN

Article 99 (1) (f) Conducting the General Election Order (7 of 2002), Article 8 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 62 (d) (f), 63 (a) and 199 Constitutional Petitions for nomination of candidates. The Returning Officer accepted the petitioner's objection to the applicant's disqualification due to lack of educational qualification required by the respondent for the candidate for the provincial and national assembly seats. That, after the petitioner's dismissal by the Appeal Election Tribunal against the approval of the applicant's nomination papers, the petitioner filed the petition. Shin had filed a constitutional petition against the tribunal's decision that respondent appeared in the BA Annual Examination in 2002 and had been involved in unfair sources matter, disqualified for a term of three years, In such cases, no one was eligible to appear in the pre-test exams as compared to 2005, however, the nation was successful in appearing in the first Annual Examination 2003 when it changed its name to fraudulent means by adopting fraudulent means. Respondent submitted a fraudulent record so he did not need any inquiry and inquiry, without any imagination, did not declare it Indulgence. Under Article 62 (1) of the Constitution as well as Article 99 (1) (f) of the Public Representation Act, 1976, the conscious, virtuous, non-profit, honest and honest cannot be allowed to contest. ? Degree obtained by the respondent on the basis of the examination in 2003, since then the petition filed by the applicant by the University was canceled, the Election Tribunal order passed by the High Court. property advocate from Chakwal lawyer