Find a Lawyer

ABDUL AZIZ versus MUHAMMAD ISHAQ

Article 185 (3) of the Immovable Property and Displaced Persons Act (XIV of 1975), section 2 was passed by the Settlement Authorities in favor of the appellant, in its constitutional jurisdiction by the High Court. The petitioner has sought to file a constitutional petition through the defendants that he could not rely on technical and procedural aspects to avoid the applicant of the area in dispute as the writ petitioner does not form part of the transferred area. That is, the defendants could not approve the ugly orders, because there was no such area of respondents Secondly, because they had no place in the matter, and third, the facts were at their discretion, and the circumstances of the case could not be exercised in their favor, so the decision was set aside in appeal. Was. criminal advocate from Qasba Gujrat lawyer