SALEHA MAQSOOD versus T.M.A. THROUGH TEHSIL NAZIM, FAISALABAD
Sections 42 and 54 were the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OLXX, RR1 and 2 suits for declaration and permission for a permanent injunction, questions for litigation. Regarding whether the claimant, who claimed to be the owner of the plot in question, was entitled to use it as a commercial property without paying the conversion fee. And whether the applicant's case has attracted notification by the authorities, the questions were pending before the trial court and matters were settled in this regard, if, at this point, the High Court had decided on two disputes. That said, in fact, the money and the trial to decide the case may be before the trial court for any party to decide the issues involved in the case, given the record and the evidence in the case. Yes, the trial court was ordered to decide. Defendant's case within a certain period of time after hearing the parties in accordance with the law. \ R \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Jamrud Road lawyer
