MUHAMMAD SARWAR KHAN versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ
Article 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Applicants for rehabilitation of applicants, their review, rejected by the High Court, was dismissed for such proceedings, notice served Notwithstanding this, the opportunity to prosecute such revision was given to the applicant with due caution on the due date and for this purpose it was issued a registered postcard to show some It was also not on record that such postcard was not correctly addressed or the date on which it was sent. There was ample material available before the High Court for the services and counsel's hearing, which reinforced the lawyer's past behavior that he was avoiding the hearing and decision on the merits. Denying a revision by default and refusing to reinstate is no such question. The law requiring further examination was denied on grounds of appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Fateh Pur lawyer
