MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus MUHAMMAD RASHID
The testimony of section 302/34, the testimony of the ocular witnesses was quite constant, the gunman of the accused arrived at the scene and fired a shot which killed the SI witnesses who were closely related on both sides and the residents of the same area, therefore, Could not say whether they are interested or witness to the occasion. Witnesses did not allege that there was no previous serious rivalry between the parties involved in misleading the alleged party and that there was a sudden outburst in the incident, therefore, no death sentence was demanded. The motive was established because Roll was accused of pouring kerosene, digging a ceiling and then setting fire to a room after digging with accused A, which the accused had taken asylum, depending on the accused. Was not a defense of the evil accused. Was absolutely impossible and was not supported by any evidence
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Khanqah Sharif lawyer
