Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR MAHBOOB versus MST. KAUSAR

Section 12 of the testimony (10 of 1984), Arts 72 and 79, alleges the execution of a contract to sell the professor that the defendant had contracted to sell and demanded specific performance by the same plaintiff. In order to deny the execution of the agreement to sell the evidence presented. The plaintiff was disputed The plaintiff failed to prove the place where the bargaining took place and where the seller's contract was written The witness and the seller's contract were silent as to who paid the sale price The trial court heard. The case was dismissed while the appellate court allowed the appeal and the case was settled in favor of the plaintiff. The contract to sell the litigation allegation was not proved by the plaintiff, unless it was otherwise a legal relationship between the parties. Was not produced and the judgment and judgment issued by the appellate court were dismissed. The trial court was reinstated property advocate from Baroute lawyer