Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus ABDUL HAFEEZ KHAN

A. VIII, R10 and Section 92 Specific Relief Act (of 1877), suit for declaration of return of section 42 suit, the defendant filed a petition for return of the plaintiff which allowed Rs. 10,000 under section 92. The price was excluded, given by the CPC Advocate General and there was no reason as to the legal status of the current litigation agency by a religious trust party to transfer the application under the law. And demanded an apology for a cost of Rs 10,000. Conditions

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• WAPDA through Chairman WAPDA v. BHAJAN DAS TEJWANI 2014 MLD 1765
• SHAH JAHAN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1767
• RAJAB v. State 2014 YLR 1769
• MUMTAZ v. State 2014 MLD 1773
• VEJAY KUMAR v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1783
• MUHAMMAD NABI v. State 2014 MLD 1783
• ASHIQUE MUHAMMAD alias ASHIQUE ALI v. State 2014 YLR 1784
• FAKEER MUHAMMAD v. ABDUL JABBAR 2014 YLR 1787

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

advocate from Umer Kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes