ZULFIQAR ALI versus MRS. WAJIHA SALEEM

Sections 17 and 2 (g) The eviction request The contest landlord's dispute was that the premises were needed for his personal need while the tenant claimed to apply for a removal based on the lawyer's personal need. Was not eligible The tenant of the rent controller's property acknowledged that the applicant was the landlord but did not own the damaged premises, the landlord paid the rent with the landlord and the landlord and the tenant on the tenancy agreement. Relations existed between the parties. Do not dispute the landlord and tenant's relationship with the original landlord and the current landlord / landlord to prove personal need that his / her lawyer can be examined and there was no compulsion. The witness must be present in the landlord's absence / representation by the owner and the lawyer was not fatal to him by the tenant that he was unfairly treated as a property owner's absence. There was no question raised by the tenant during the cross-examination of the land where no decision was made regarding the powers of the lawyer and the personal need of the original owner. Some part of the evidence was uncorroborated and without scrutiny, it was believed that Landlady was able to produce credible and credible evidence to prove that the damaged premises were in good faith in the personal interest of the original owner. Appeal was dropped for the requirement.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

best advocate from Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes

👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team