ABDUL JALIL versus AJOON
Sections 68 and 90 of the Registration Act 1908 and 90 Registration PCT (XVI of 1908), Sections 17 and 49 of the Central Law (Constitutional Reforms), the Ordinance (XXI of 1960), the 30 year old document have been recognized in evidence as Objection to inserting the document on the ground. At least two witnesses were confirmed by the law and no testimony was presented, nor did any evidence prove that such witnesses were not available. Object section 68, cannot depend on the provisions of the Evidence Act. , 1872, because in 1935, when such documents were written, the Student Act, 1872, did not apply to the area to which such a document was related.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Chashma lawyer
