Find a Lawyer

RAID ALI versus STATE

Section 302/34 The testimony of the witnesses relates to the deceased's eyewitnesses and was in disgust with the accused and contradicted each other on material points, and their testimony contradicted the site's plan and medical evidence. This was not confirmed by any independent fragment. Although the incident occurred in broad daylight in the village population, there was no independent evidence to support the prosecution's case, sending the evacuees on the spot to a firearms specialist only. Not for feedback and scrutiny. No weapon was recovered in this case. In such cases there will be no benefit to the accused's retaliatory action. The accused was given the benefit of the doubt and was acquitted in the circumstances. best law firms from Gujranwala lawyer