SHAHID ALIAS PARVEZ versus STATE
Section 2302 (b) eyewitness testimony was relied on before the value of the evidence was relied upon and the High Court relied on them, while deciding on the appeal of the co-accused, the presence said that the eyewitness testimony record at the relevant time. And their statements affected confidence and supported / confirmed the meadow legal reports, the motive behind the incident was also on record and it further strengthened the prosecution's case and sought the prosecution's investigation after the incident. Gave a strong, serious debt, fled the law and was convicted for almost two years, prosecuting There was another case to support the case that dismissed the appeal against the trial case, in which case the defendant was convicted at trial, but that could not be extended because the accused An unimportant part of was hit. Dead and nothing was on record to show that the recovered gun was ever used in oak cranes.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Tall lawyer