MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus STATE
Defining the evidence of Sections 302 (b) and 302 (c), the case was reduced to two versions, one prosecutor took, while the other presented the accused in his statement under section 342, the CCP accused pleaded. Was self-defense, but did not find a scratch on his body even though the defendant had charged the accused, but the accused did not exceed that right nor was it coming under Section 302 (b) PPC and Neither has he been proven guilty after being convicted. An acquittal was also recovered from the scene, the two sides did not approach the trial court with clear hands, the accused was found guilty of Section 302 (b), the PPC was charged under Section 302 (c) PPC. Converted to one, RI compensation amount was also reduced from Rs 100,000 to Rs 50 000
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Punch lawyer
