KHALIFA SUBEDAR versus MEMBER, FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION
Legal Settlement Agreement by the solicitor of the petitioner requesting the request of the Civil Procedure Code Order III, R 4 and O XXIII, R 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request for CPC The dispute arose in the plea agreement, whether the lawyer presenting the settlement process in court represented the applicant as a fact lawyer. Whether the applicant's lawyer has been authorized by the parties to do such work. And whether all the applicants agreed to the compromise, then only the relevant factual aspects can be declared conclusive only after the examination by witnesses is examined, such action is not valid in the constitutional jurisdiction. So as not to apply to the recent decisions of the lower forum on the dispute of facts. High court constitutional jurisdiction, application dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Kohlu lawyer