Find a Lawyer

MUSADDAQ ABBASI versus ABDUL HAMEED MUGHAL

Sections 561A, 249A, 417, 435, 439A, 193 and 476 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 420, 468 and 471 ordering the executive magistrate to make such an attempt Disqualified for, the matter was referred to a Sessions Judge by a competent Court Sessions Judge, the proceedings under Section 193 PPC were handed over to the Judicial Magistrate, keeping in view the fact that the case as a Magistrate. They were assigned and did not need it. The proceedings initiated on the application under the PC Order section PC7676 Cr of the Executive Magistrate cannot be modified by the Judicial Magistrate Section because the authority to modify the magistrate's order has been charged with the release of Sessions Judicial Magistrate. Because they have no chance. The order of release of the sentence, since the matter was in fact under section 249A, CCPC and it was said that the applicant should move to the High Court Dare Section 417, CRPC challenged the respondents' victory. While ordering acquittal of the accused could not be challenged under Section 435/439A, this variable order of CPPC magistrate was never challenged under Section 417, CRPC. The CPP said that the order of cancellation was not, in the circumstances famous high court advocate from Mian Walli lawyer