GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. versus ALLAUDDIN
CPC appearance and non-submission of Civil Procedure Code Order IX O IX, R 13, OXVII, R 2; Section 12 (2) and 115 absence of the day-to-day proceedings on which the trial was adjourned. The proceedings, under the provisions of OXVI, R2, CPC, have been moved and the court has the power to exclude the matter from any of the powers. It has been instructed by AIX, CPC, to request that the former party be a former part of the Decree Party, so that under OIX, R 13, CPC review, An appeal or request will be made to keep the former party decree separate. In section 12 (2), the CPC where a party opted to seek treatment under O IX, R 13, the CPC court had to restrict its inquiry to whether the summons was not properly presented. And that he was prevented from appearing on the call for any reason. The court could not suppress the summons non-service application in the case where a party had appeared and participated in the proceedings through a lawyer.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Bhara Kahu lawyer