LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH DIRECTOR-GENERAL versus CHAUDHRY ILAM DIN
O IX, R 6 Final findings of fact by the successful bidder courts of the former Parliament decree, deposit large sums according to the payment schedule but the authorities, without informing the plaintiff, cancel the auction Appeared but did not enter any written statement and the present judgment and the decree passed in favor of the plaintiff were retained by the lower appellate court in response to the verdict on the justification stage. That any record of documentary evidence could be recorded, thus denying the authorities Didn't matter Both the plaintiffs' courts together concluded that the plaintiff is entitled to buy the plot in the auction notice / letter by which the auctioneer's bid was canceled by the authorities, without any jurisdiction and Failed to have any legal effect on the rights of the plaintiff. In order to indicate any ambiguity, illegal, both the courts considered regular and jurisdictional defects and orders absolutely inconceivable and were not open to any interference and revised the situation in error. Was deleted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Dargai lawyer