Find a Lawyer

ASGHAR ALI versus STATE

Abduction charge against accused involved in FIR by delay of 4 days in order to approve further investigation in filing Section 497 (2) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 367 / A and 377/34 bail, FIR Was charged and no such charge was made. The record against the accused revealed that in the statement under Section 161, CRPC, the victim had stated that he was not misbehaved by the accused and only by the investigating officer did the investigating officer The reason was investigated that after proper investigation, the accused was taken into consideration and did not commit any unnatural crime with the victim. During the course of investigation no defamatory material was recovered, within the meaning of section 497 (2). A further inquiry into the crime of the accused, the CRPC, was made, in which case the accused has long been a victim of anxiety. Detention of the accused in jail could not serve any useful purpose; any other accused was admitted on bail under the circumstances. property advocates from Bhirya Road lawyer