Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM FATIMA versus S.H.O.


The Act against the property (the enforcement of ud H 1979 of) the ordinance (clause VI 1979 of 1979), Article 14 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 dismisses the constitutional petitioner / accused and others in the FIR. And was assigned a specific role to perform. The burglary accused and others were found to be fully involved in the investigation and challan was prepared, allegations made in the FIR, in light of the result of the investigation, were not shown false or any substance. It was also necessary to be without an accused. Before the trial, serious charges were leveled against the accused in the alternative treatment FIR filed for trial before the trial court, which the accused denied in the dispute, leading to a controversial question. That couldn't be resolved. In the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Karak lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.