ZAKAR NAZAR HUSSAIN versus KHAN MUHAMMAD
5,000 for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction were set by the plaintiff / plaintiff of the Declaration of Judgment of the Decision Decision of the judgment, but against the order of the trial court. The revision filed was undone. The appellate court will be presented to the High Court on the ground that it has no jurisdiction that the value of the property involved has exceeded its jurisdiction, before the Appellate Court, Considering that the determination of the court through the judicial court up to that time, it can be ascertained what the nature of the suit is for court fee and jurisdictional purposes, regarding the pricing and review forum set up in Plante. Will be taken as the deciding factors.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Matli lawyer
