MST. BASEERAT NAZ versus SECRETARY EDUCATION (S&L) N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR
Sections 3, 5 and 9 of the Northwest Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974), Section 4 Appointment Terms and Appeal Service of Tribunal Appellant, which as a Section EBPS 16 in the Department of Education 23 5 1995 Were serving on a regular basis. In response to an advertisement for the post of Headmistress requested by the appropriate channel and after qualifying the written test / interview, they were posted to the Headmistress on these terms and conditions as amended in 2005 by the North West Frontier Province. To be governed by the Civil Servants Act, 1973. In the advertisement given by the Public Service Commission, it was clearly stated that in the case of regular public servants, their appointment would be in accordance with the terms and conditions already in place for them and in accordance with the provincial contract policy. Will not be affected. The government adviser for the appellant claimed that the order was illegal, illegal and was adopted in violation of the rules and that no appointment was treated in accordance with the law and that the law and the constitution Its rights were guaranteed and guaranteed. The service tribunal noted the discrimination on behalf of the department and other departments because they had appointed some of their employees on a regular basis and were allowed the terms and conditions of service already available to them. For employees the rules of public servants were equally applicable. To the extent that appellant's appointments and services are regarded as regular and pensionable with previous benefits.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
