AYAZ versus STATE
Section 497 Property Against Crimes (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (3) bail, although not charged in the FIR, but police stopped the motorcade that surrounded the area. Which was allegedly used. In the event of a collision, cross-firing was carried out on both sides in which the accused was arrested and under the FIR section Ar24 / / 3 35 19/7 427, 2020 ///, PPC and Section 13 The West Pakistan Weapons Ordinance, filed in 1965, has been registered under Section 164, CRPC, in which it is accused of committing a crime. The accused also identified the incident, where the complainant was deprived of a mobile phone and cash, the crime against the accused was a felony and it was a more serious way and the scene of the incident, which has become commonplace in the society and It had weakened the society. The crime was severely punished, which was imposed on the accused, though there was no problem. But for anybody, but more than \ ancestry was taken away, on reasonable grounds, there was a presumption that the accused had committed the crime, which came under the prohibition clause of section 497, c. CP Bell was denied. Under the circumstances \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Khyber Agency lawyer