FARHAD SAJID versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, ISLAMABAD THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Section 497 (2) National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Sections 9 and 10 bail, against further inquiry alleging that he is a Forest Range Officer, involved in the ruthless cutting of trees in the Government Reserve Green Forest. In its controlling jurisdiction, the total government loss in the reference was calculated at Rs 114 million and the responsibility was fixed against these nine persons, three of whom were compensated by the play deal. Even though he was charged individually. The loss was calculated at Rs 8 728 million, but this calculation was expanding when the responsibility of each accused was taken into account. In this case, if the allegation against the accused is proved, his final sentence would have to be proportionately substantiated to the extent of the actual loss so that the accused could now be established against the trial court, for this purpose, carefully calculated. Have to book and weigh your responsibility on justice. At least on the scale, at the point of actual damages attributable to the accused, further investigation was needed in this case, considering the total loss and number of accused, the maximum sentence of imprisonment was not feasible, Only for this purpose was a temporary diagnosis. There will be bail and the matter of the court and the qualities of the mind will not be affected at the time of the final announcement. In the strange facts and circumstances of the case, it was appropriate to extend the bail, mainly because of the limited liability of the accused, mainly because of the long liability against the accused, there was no possibility of hiding it and the bail was stopped. Could not go The suspect was released on bail as a punishment, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
