Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus JAVED IQBAL

Complainants of the Criminal Code (CRPC) Sections 435 and 439 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1800), section 302/34, defended their statement in the trial to meet the defense's defense argument. Has changed. The FIR was recorded after deliberately and impartially and did not result in any prosecution from the beginning when the complainant and other witnesses were present on the spot at the time of the incident. Evidence of contradiction with the medical evidence of the defendant did not prove satisfactory, prompting no conviction. The complainant also changed his statement in the case to be in accordance with the medical evidence and most of the natural witnesses who were at the scene of the incident. But were not confessionally cited as witnesses, nor were the police The defendants are ready to support the prosecution, and the others were imported as eyewitnesses because they could not be lightly disregarded after deliberations, the prosecution's evidence, therefore, was appropriate by the trial court. Was rejected for reasons. patent advocate from Shamsabad lawyer