KHAN TALIB HUSSAIN BALUCH versus LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE THROUGH REGISTRAR SERVICE
Section Ad Remedial Remarks, the appeal was directed against the order dismissing the appeal under which the applicant's representation for removal of the negative remarks listed in his ACR was dismissed, the appellant year 1984 1984 in I joined the service as Additional District and Sessions Judge and the record showed that there was no negative entry in his previous AC, nothing was on record to show that the appeal. How a sudden change in consumer behavior and good behavior occurred and the alleged entry of negative remarks was not supported. As a result, there was severe prejudice. The notification given to the appellant's selection grade BS 21 Parts II, III and the Appellant's ACR IV by the Appellate High Court shows that he was rated as good and in Part VI (collectively) Grading) Appellant was found to be good (better than the majority of officers) unclean enrollment, to some extent incompatible with the enrollment of other parts of the ACR. Deleted and negative comments listed in Applicant's ACR for the relevant period
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Sibi lawyer