Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD LATIF ALIAS TIFA versus STATE

Section 2 302 (b) Dismissal of evidence, reduction of cases reduced to felony, felony conviction for four years, and after trial, the trial court pronounced the death sentence, which was affirmed by the High Court. Did It was through the accused that the witnesses substituted the original culprit with the accused, only to retaliate. Witnesses' testimony cannot be doubted as they do not allow the real culprit to be a close relative of the victim and want to substitute him with the accused only. The presence of witnesses at the scene of the incident was also natural and both witnesses' evidence was corroborated by medical evidence in which all material details were filed in the FIR, which not only gave the names of the accused but also of them. Specific roles were also assigned to each. Their incident was a mild murder on a broad day and the accused knew both of them first, so you are a witness, the possibility of misidentification was denied, when the incident lasted very long for almost four to four years. Taken as a piece of evidence, no blank was recovered from the investigating officer's place in the case. Since this is a cross-fire case, the Supreme Court changed the death sentence to life imprisonment. property advocates from Shikarpur lawyer