MUHAMMAD DIN versus NAZIR AHMAA
Limitation Act 1908 Article 144 Claiming Defendant's Affirmative Assertion of Suitable Property By Negative Occupancy, In this regard, the document failed to substantiate its claim through documentary or oral evidence, the plaintiff seized the disputed property. Filed a lawsuit which the defendant overruled and affirmed. By presenting documentary and oral evidence which fully established the property in dispute that the defendant's property had not been in the possession of the defendant for more than 12 years, the defendant failed to prove adverse possession of the suit in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Chak Jamal lawyer