NIKKA KHAN versus SETTLEMENT AUTHORITIES, LAHORE DIVISION
Section 10 and 11 liters of patent (Lahore), C1 10 liters of patent appeal transfer re-allotment of the displacement forms were rejected on the basis that the appellant was rented. Failed to collect outstanding balance of. And since the property was located in a commercial area, the entire property was irrevocable and had to be considered as a shop and thus entitled to the transfer as well as the claim of the appellant revoked by the forums under the appellant. It has been reported that an unclean order was passed against it. It was not reported; that the appellant was subjected to discrimination and that the appellant had not had the opportunity to show that he had the ability to distribute the property disposed of by the appellant to the High Court. Had properly dealt with and rejected, and had no reason to differ from the results. The settlement was permanently agreed upon by the settlement authority and the High Court; on such results, the inquiry cannot be allowed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
