MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus MUHAMMAD JAHANZEB KHAN
7th XVII, R 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The elimination of the evidence was the petitioner's conviction that the case was not postponed with the instruction of the applicant to appear before the trial court at a later date. There was no chance of action against him. Under O XVII, R 3, CPC and even if the court decided to close the applicant's evidence, it was his legal obligation to provide the applicant with the opportunity to record his statement, Appeal leave proceedings will be suspended pending the application of the application allowed for consideration pending, and the security, which had already been submitted by the applicant, upon receipt of the leave of appeal, the order The appeal will be upheld for the purpose of satisfying.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate FR Bannu lawyer