ABDUL SAMAD KHAN versus JIWAN
CPC Appeals O XLI, R 27 (2) Appeal from the original order of the CLC Code of Conduct, additional evidence during the proceedings in the Appellate Court while the production of additional evidence is neither allowed nor provided for any reason. Nor can requests for observation of documents be heard. A decision was required, the order of the appellate court was not lasting and if there was any need for admission of additional documents / evidence, the applicant should have had the opportunity to present the evidence in the appellate court's dismissal order and remand with the case. Was obtained. The Directive that Appellate Court Rider Order XLI, R 27, CPC decides that the lid of the law provides the applicant with an opportunity to present proof of rejection in the application filed by the applicant in accordance with the law's lid. File accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Panjgur lawyer