Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ABDUL SAMAD KHAN versus JIWAN


CPC Appeals O XLI, R 27 (2) Appeal from the original order of the CLC Code of Conduct, additional evidence during the proceedings in the Appellate Court while the production of additional evidence is neither allowed nor provided for any reason. Nor can requests for observation of documents be heard. A decision was required, the order of the appellate court was not lasting and if there was any need for admission of additional documents / evidence, the applicant should have had the opportunity to present the evidence in the appellate court's dismissal order and remand with the case. Was obtained. The Directive that Appellate Court Rider Order XLI, R 27, CPC decides that the lid of the law provides the applicant with an opportunity to present proof of rejection in the application filed by the applicant in accordance with the law's lid. File accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Panjgur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.