MUMTAZ AHMAD versus MUBARAK AKHTAR
The Civil Procedure Code Order XLI of the CPC Appeals was reinstated on the appeal of the appellant by the Court of Appeal, dismissing O XLI, R 19 and Section 115 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), section 5 non-prosecution. The petition for delay in filing with the re-entry of the said that no proper reason was disclosed by the appellant for not appearing at the hearing of the application when the appeal was dismissed for non-submission. Was filed and the petition filed for defamation of delay did not show any good reason, nor did it apply for delayed restoration every day. In the appellate court it was specified that the appellate restitution order be passed mechanically and that the appellate court, without applying the court's mind, order the appellate court in review by the High Court. Was given.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Okara lawyer
