GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, LAHORE versus DR. SAADIA ASHRAF BHATTI
R4 (1) (b) (V) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) liable to prevent two increments that result in the termination of employment, which would result in the absence of duty. Was prosecuted, fined dismissed. On behalf of the Service Tribunal, however, the two penalties were changed to a penalty for filing an appeal against the said penalty, the tribunal clearly stated that the defendant was not intentionally absent. And the request for leave was not answered by the respondent. The applicant department's sentence for stopping two receipts was, in the circumstances, fair and reasonable; there is no question of law of public importance; from being involved in the matter, the petition against the judgment of the tribunal was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Haripur lawyer