Section 3? Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 204 ?? Contempt court? During the writ petition, the lawyer insulted the judge's face and remarked that he was in favor of the respondent group, not actually fixing the case. History because they belong to a particular political party? Despite the judge's caution, the lawyer persisted in his behavior and repeated the remarks, the lawyer also interfered with the judge and was obstructed while he was issuing a contempt of court order? Instead of the incident and the way this incident occurred or was presented in contempt of court notice, he acknowledged the most important things. The Councilor neither expressed any sincere commitment to his work nor promised to repeat it in the future, so that the apologist was not entitled to accept a portion of his statement? What happened, the words spoken in the questions were in the nature of most order defamation and the type of farming was done on the court? The council, therefore, was yes
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
