Find a Lawyer

SUGHRAN BIBI versus KHUSHI MUHAMMAD

Homeless persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958 Section 10 Withdrawal of Property and Displaced Persons Act (XIV of 1975), Section 3 Settlement Scheme No. VIII The applicant is a displaced person who has to evacuate. The property was transferred and the applicant paid the full price, resulting in such exchange authority assuming that some amount was not paid by the applicant, the property was resumed. , And it was transferred to the PTD issuer, when, after the Authority realized the error, the reinstatement order was withdrawn and the plaintiff (outstanding property) was returned to the respondent in favor of the respondent. The pending transfer was sent for cancellation, but the administrator refused to cancel it because it did not There is no jurisdiction to rent because PTD had previously issued in favor of the defendant property. Transferred to the applicant for which the entire payment was made to the satisfaction of the Settlement Authority, consequently cannot be resumed and transferred to another person, and the PTD issued to such other person is illegal. Which can be canceled without legal authorization The applicant will be entitled to live in peace on the property that was previously transferred. lawer from fb area from Rahwali lawyer